Publication Description
BACKGROUND: Our objective was to quantify and predict diabetes risk reduction during the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (DPPOS) in participants who returned to normal glucose regulation at least once during the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) compared with those who consistently met criteria for prediabetes.
METHODS: DPPOS is an ongoing observational study of participants from the DPP randomised trial. For this analysis, diabetes cumulative incidence in DPPOS was calculated for participants with normal glucose regulation or prediabetes status during DPP with and without stratification by previous randomised treatment group. Cox proportional hazards modelling and generalised linear mixed models were used to quantify the effect of previous (DPP) glycaemic status on risk of later (DPPOS) diabetes and normal glucose regulation status, respectively, per SD in change. Included in this analysis were 1990 participants of DPPOS who had been randomly assigned to treatment groups during DPP (736 intensive lifestyle intervention, 647 metformin, 607 placebo). These studies are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00004992 (DPP) and NCT00038727 (DPPOS).
FINDINGS: Diabetes risk during DPPOS was 56% lower for participants who had returned to normal glucose regulation versus those who consistently had prediabetes (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44, 95% CI 0.37-0.55, p<0.0001) and was unaffected by previous group assignment (interaction test for normal glucose regulation and lifestyle intervention, p=0.1722; normal glucose regulation and metformin, p=0.3304). Many, but not all, of the variables that increased diabetes risk were inversely associated with the chance of a participant reaching normal glucose regulation status in DPPOS. Specifically, previous achievement of normal glucose regulation (odds ratio [OR] 3.18, 95% CI 2.71-3.72, p<0.0001), increased beta-cell function (OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.18-1.39, p<0.0001), and insulin sensitivity (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08-1.25, p<0.0001) were associated with normal glucose regulation in DPPOS, whereas the opposite was true for prediction of diabetes, with increased beta-cell function (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71-0.89, p<0.0001) and insulin sensitivity (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.94, p=0.0001) having a protective effect. Among participants who did not return to normal glucose regulation in DPP, those assigned to the intensive lifestyle intervention had a higher diabetes risk (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03-1.68, p=0.0304) and lower chance of normal glucose regulation (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.42-0.82, p=0.0014) than did the placebo group in DPPOS.
INTERPRETATION: We conclude that prediabetes is a high-risk state for diabetes, especially in patients who remain with prediabetes despite intensive lifestyle intervention. Reversion to normal glucose regulation, even if transient, is associated with a significantly reduced risk of future diabetes independent of previous treatment group.
FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.